The Franconian
Coder Studio

Go strikes a brilliant balance, offering developers a powerful combination of simplicity, speed, and efficiency. Yet, there are always those moments in a project where you need to reach deeper, to extend a library, optimize a critical path, or tap into low-level system functionality. In these instances, the natural choice has often been C, with its unparalleled system access and performance. For Go developers, this has traditionally meant turning to CGo. But is it still the only option? The emergence of libraries like Purego presents a compelling alternative, promising a simpler path. This article breaks down the motivations behind each tool and the crucial factors to consider before deciding which bridge to C is right for your next project.

In software development, we champion simplicity and minimalism in our code, yet our physical workspaces often tell a different story. Like many, I was convinced that more screen real estate was synonymous with higher productivity. My journey from a single laptop to a sprawling three-monitor setup, complete with a vertical screen, was driven by that very belief. But I discovered that more space often just means more room for distraction. This is my reflection on choosing focus over frenzy and why I ultimately returned to the clarity of a single screen.

If your current web development workflow feels bloated with endless frameworks, libraries, and dependencies, you're not alone. I've traveled that same path, using everything from jQuery and Angular to React and its vast ecosystem. But the web platform has matured immensely, offering powerful native APIs that often make those heavy abstractions unnecessary. This shift in approach isn't just about chasing the new; it's about embracing simplicity, performance, and true ownership of your code. In this article, I'll outline the modern standards and tools that form my new, streamlined blueprint for building web applications.

If you’ve deployed anything in the cloud lately, you’ve almost certainly used containers. They’ve become the foundational building block of modern applications. But as we push towards more dynamic, scalable, and efficient architectures, I’ve been looking at the overhead that even lightweight containers introduce. That’s what led me to WASI. This emerging standard leverages WebAssembly’s sandboxed model outside the browser, promising a fundamental shift in how we package and run code. In this article, I’ll break down how WASI works, where it shines compared to containers, and what it means for the future of microservices and edge computing.

When working with web technologies, I prefer keeping things minimal and dependency-light. That’s why I’ve been experimenting with Bun to bundle TypeScript code efficiently. However, Web Workers present two specific challenges: Bun doesn’t automatically adjust worker instantiation for TypeScript, and JSON-based communication is both inefficient and untyped. In this article, I’ll share how I solved these issues using a custom build script and CBOR serialization—resulting in faster, more reliable worker communication.